The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled that police collecting a urine sample from suspected drunken drivers without a warrant is unconstitutional. Chief Justice Lorie Gildea writes that “despite the state’s ‘great’ need for alcohol concentration testing, the availability of a less-invasive breath test weighs against… requiring the more revealing and embarrassing urine test.” Gildea goes on to say that in situations where a breath rest is not sufficient, nothing prevents the police from seeking a warrant for a urine test. The ruling comes out of a 2012 case in which a man arrested for suspected D-W-I failed a preliminary breath test and refused to provide a blood or urine sample in jail.